Still Technically at War: How the Korean War Ended in 1953 (A Lesson for Ukraine?)

 As the Russia-Ukraine war marks one year and enter into the second year, an end to the war seems a long way off. And some raise the possibility that it might be following how the Korean War (1950-53) ended in an armistice.

The Korean War, which began in 1950, ended in a ceasefire in 1953 with the signing of an armistice agreement. However, a peace treaty was never signed, and the two Koreas remain technically at war. The reasons for this include stalemate, political tensions, disagreements over prisoners of war, and North Korea's refusal to recognize South Korea. The armistice agreement resulted in the division of Korea, ongoing military presence in the region, and periodic military skirmishes. Recent efforts to negotiate a peace settlement between North and South Korea offer hope for resolving the conflict, but the prospects for peace remain uncertain.

Can the world find some lessons from what happened on the Korean Peninsula more than half a century ago?


Still Technically at War: How the Korean War Ended in 1953... A Lesson for Ukraine?

The Korean War, which began in 1950, resulted in a ceasefire in 1953, but a peace treaty was never signed. As a result, technically, the two Koreas are still at war. In this article, we’ll explore how the Korean War ended and why it still technically continues.


The Korean War: A Brief Overview

The Korean War began on June 25, 1950, when North Korean troops invaded South Korea. The United Nations, with the United States as the main participant, intervened on behalf of South Korea. China intervened on behalf of North Korea, and the Soviet Union provided military assistance to North Korea.

The war continued for three years, resulting in millions of civilian and military casualties. The war devastated the Korean Peninsula, leaving it divided between North and South.


The Armistice Agreement of 1953

On July 27, 1953, an armistice agreement was signed between the United Nations Command, the Korean People’s Army, and the Chinese People’s Volunteer Army. The agreement established a ceasefire line and created a demilitarized zone (DMZ) that runs roughly along the 38th parallel.

The armistice agreement effectively ended the fighting and established a temporary peace, but it did not officially end the war. The agreement called for a political conference to be held within three months to negotiate a peace settlement, but this never happened.


Why Wasn't a Peace Treaty Signed?

There were several reasons why a peace treaty was never signed to end the Korean War:

  • Stalemate: Neither side was able to achieve a decisive victory, and the war ended in a stalemate.
  • Political tensions: The political tensions between the two Koreas and their allies, the United States and China, made it difficult to reach a peace settlement.
  • Prisoners of war: The two sides disagreed on the repatriation of prisoners of war, which led to a prolonged negotiation process.
  • Status of South Korea: North Korea did not recognize South Korea as a legitimate state and demanded that the United States withdraw its troops from the Korean Peninsula.

As a result, the armistice agreement remained in effect, and the two Koreas are still technically at war.


The Consequences of the Armistice

The armistice agreement had several consequences:
  • Division of Korea: The agreement solidified the division of Korea into two separate states, with the DMZ serving as a physical and political barrier.
  • Military presence: The United States maintains a military presence in South Korea to this day, as a result of the armistice agreement.
  • Ongoing tension: The lack of a peace treaty has led to ongoing tension and periodic military skirmishes between North and South Korea.


Find out why the Korean War, which technically ended in 1953, still leaves the two Koreas at war. Explore the armistice agreement and its ongoing impact on the region. #KoreanWar #DMZ #NorthKorea #SouthKorea #peace


Prospects for Peace

Despite the ongoing tensions, there have been recent efforts to negotiate a peace settlement between North and South Korea. In 2018, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and South Korean President Moon Jae-in held a historic summit, during which they pledged to work towards a peace treaty to formally end the war.
In 2019, U.S. President Donald Trump became the first sitting U.S. president to cross the DMZ into North Korea, meeting with Kim Jong-un at the border. While no peace treaty has been signed, these efforts represent a potential step towards resolving the ongoing conflict.


how-korean-war-ended-in-1953-lesson-for-ukraine-in-2023


Still Technically at War... Any Lessons for Ukraine?

The Korean War technically ended in 1953 with an armistice agreement, but a peace treaty was never signed, and the two Koreas remain technically at war. The lack of a peace settlement has led to ongoing tension and military presence in the region. Recent efforts to negotiate a peace settlement between North and South Korea offer some hope for resolving the ongoing conflict. However, it remains to be seen whether these efforts will result in a formal end to the Korean War and a lasting peace on the Korean Peninsula.

In the meantime, the armistice agreement continues to govern the relationship between North and South Korea and their allies, and the DMZ remains a potent symbol of the division that still exists on the Korean Peninsula. While the prospects for peace may be uncertain, it is clear that the legacy of the Korean War and its ongoing impact on the region will continue to be felt for years to come.

Hope is the world leaders, as well as the Ukrainian people, could find any useful lessons from South Korea's experience, as the country still struggles to find ever-lasting peace and prosperity on the peninsula even after the end of war several decades ago.


With wishes for peace in Ukraine.