AGI: Angel or Demon? Prepare for the AGI Era Arriving Within 30 Years and a Future Where Labor Income Is Displaced!

AGI: Angel or Demon? Prepare for the AGI Era Arriving Within 30 Years and a Future Where Labor Income Is Displaced!



πŸ“Œ Summary

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is highly likely to become a reality within 20 to 30 years. While it could offer angelic opportunities for humanity, such as solving climate change, it also poses a demonic threat that could strip away the value of human labor and shake the very foundations of democracy.


πŸ“– Why It Matters! (Meaning and Context)

Current AI excels in specific domains, but AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), as its name suggests, refers to AI that surpasses human capabilities across all domains. Once dismissed as science fiction, the emergence of ChatGPT has intensified discussions that the AGI era could arrive within 2 to 5 years, or as long as 20 to 30 years. This is not merely a matter of technological advancement; its significance lies in posing profound questions that could fundamentally transform humanity's economic systems, social structures, and even human identity itself. Prof. Kim Dae-sik's book AGI: Angel or Devil? presents in-depth reflections on the sustainability of the current labor-income-based economic structure and democracy when AGI arrives.


πŸ”₯ Key Takeaways

AGI‘s emergence carries duality, bringing both benefits and threats to humanity.

1️⃣ Potential Benefits of AGI (Angelic Aspects)

  • Overwhelming Learning Speed: Acquires knowledge by 'plugging in’ learning data far faster than human reading/writing/conversation methods, precisely adjusting weights.
  • Perpetual Capability Development: AI can learn continuously without dying, making it highly likely to surpass human capabilities.
  • Problem-Solving Potential: AGI can independently research, learn, and solve numerous unsolved human problems like climate issues and nuclear fusion power generation.

2️⃣ Deprivation of Human Labor Value

  • Loss of Value-Added Production Opportunities: In the AGI era, humans will be deprived of opportunities to create value-added through labor, leading directly to the disruption of labor income.
  • Critical for New Entrants to Society: Younger generations who have not yet entered the workforce face a significant risk of being deprived of the very opportunity to earn labor income, as they lack the experience to prove their superiority over AI.
  • Need for Capital Accumulation: Accumulating as much capital/assets as possible before the disruption of labor income becomes reality becomes an individual survival strategy.

3️⃣ New Dependency Relationships and Deepening Social Instability

  • Alternatives to Basic Income: Proposals such as distributing basic stock (e.g., OpenAI stock) instead of cash as an alternative to lost labor income are being discussed.
  • Risk of Technological Dependency: While some countries (UAE, UK, etc.) are pursuing contracts to receive AGI services free of charge, this carries the risk of becoming dependent on technological hegemony should prices rise in the future.
  • Parallel Theory from Roman Times: Just as Roman citizens, whose labor opportunities were taken by slaves (AGI), received basic income yet remained unhappy, ultimately finding happiness in the destruction of others (dopamine) through the Colosseum, similar social pathologies could emerge in the AGI era.

4️⃣ Risk of Collapse in Democracy's Foundations

  • Erosion of Suffrage Legitimacy: Democracy was established on the premise that individuals contribute to society through labor. If AGI eliminates the labor value through which people contribute, the legitimacy of “one person, one vote” becomes undermined.
  • Potential Emergence of a Technological Feudal Society: If the general public, deprived of labor income, ceases social contribution and becomes dependent on basic income, society could degenerate into a technological feudalsociety controlled by the minority who own AGI.


πŸ” In summary

The AGI era is highly likely to become an unavoidable future. It could present humanity with an innovative opportunity to solve global problems like climate change. However, AGI simultaneously risks rendering human labor incomeworthless. The basic income system proposed as an alternative could lead to technological dependency, social instability, and even the collapse of democracy. Individuals must coldly recognize this future trajectory and adjust their strategies to reduce dependence on labor income and focus on accumulating capital. Since the advent of the AGI era is likely beyond human control, whether AGI proves angelic or demonic, individuals must prioritize preparing for the impending technological feudalism society through investment readiness and learning preparedness.


πŸ’° Investment Advice

  • Accumulate Capital as Quickly as Possible: The deprivation of labor income due to the arrival of the AGI era is an inevitable direction. Therefore, focus on securing as much capital/assets as possible while the value of labor still remains.
  • Study and Preparation for Investment: Rather than rushing to make money out of vague FOMO, it's crucial to adopt an attitude of diligently studying and preparing to become someone who can earn money—that is, to meet the conditions for creating wealth.
  • Build a Capital Income-Centered Portfolio: In the future, the value of capital will be more important than labor. Therefore, from a long-term perspective, investments in assets that generate capital income, such as blue-chip stocks and index-tracking ETFs, should be increased.


🏷️ Keywords

#AGI #ArtificialGeneralIntelligence #AGIEra #LaborIncome #LaborValue #Capital #TechnologicalFeudalism #BasicIncome #FuturePreparation #AssetAccumulation


*Reference: 《Kim Dae-sik's Human vs. Machine



AGI, μ²œμ‚¬μΈκ°€ μ•…λ§ˆμΈκ°€?: 30λ…„ μ•ˆμ— 올 AGI μ‹œλŒ€, 노동 μ†Œλ“μ΄ λ°•νƒˆλ˜λŠ” λ―Έλž˜μ— λŒ€λΉ„ν•˜λΌ!


πŸ“Œ ν•œμ€„μš”μ•½

인곡 일반 μ§€λŠ₯(AGI)의 λ“±μž₯이 20~30λ…„ λ‚΄ ν˜„μ‹€ν™”λ  κ°€λŠ₯성이 λ†’μœΌλ©°, μ΄λŠ” 인λ₯˜μ—κ²Œ κΈ°ν›„ λ³€ν™” ν•΄κ²°κ³Ό 같은 μ²œμ‚¬ 같은 기회λ₯Ό μ œκ³΅ν•˜λŠ” λ™μ‹œμ—, μΈκ°„μ˜ 노동 κ°€μΉ˜λ₯Ό λ°•νƒˆν•˜κ³  민주주의 근간을 ν”λ“œλŠ” μ•…λ§ˆ 같은 μœ„ν˜‘μ΄ 될 수 μžˆλ‹€.


πŸ“– μ™œ μ€‘μš”ν•œκ°€! (μ˜λ―Έμ™€ λ§₯락)

ν˜„μž¬ AIλŠ” νŠΉμ • λΆ„μ•Όμ—μ„œ 인간보닀 λ›°μ–΄λ‚œ μ„±λŠ₯을 λ³΄μ΄λŠ” μˆ˜μ€€μ΄λ‚˜, AGI(Artificial General Intelligence)λŠ” 'General'μ΄λΌλŠ” μ΄λ¦„μ²˜λŸΌ λͺ¨λ“  λΆ„μ•Όμ—μ„œ μΈκ°„μ˜ λŠ₯λ ₯을 μ΄ˆμ›”ν•˜λŠ” 인곡지λŠ₯을 μ˜λ―Έν•œλ‹€. κ³Όκ±°μ—λŠ” 곡상 κ³Όν•™μœΌλ‘œ μΉ˜λΆ€λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ‚˜, 졜근 ChatGPT λ“±μž₯ 이후 AGI μ‹œλŒ€κ°€ 2λ…„μ—μ„œ 5λ…„, λ˜λŠ” κΈΈκ²ŒλŠ” 20~30λ…„ 내에 λ„λž˜ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€λŠ” λ…Όμ˜κ°€ ν™œλ°œν•΄μ‘Œλ‹€. μ΄λŠ” λ‹¨μˆœνžˆ 기술 λ°œμ „μ˜ λ¬Έμ œκ°€ μ•„λ‹ˆλΌ, 인λ₯˜μ˜ 경제 μ‹œμŠ€ν…œκ³Ό μ‚¬νšŒ ꡬ쑰, 그리고 μΈκ°„μ˜ 정체성 자체λ₯Ό 근본적으둜 λ³€ν™”μ‹œν‚¬ μ€‘λŒ€ν•œ μ§ˆλ¬Έμ„ λ˜μ§€κΈ°μ— κ·Έ μ˜λ―Έκ°€ 크닀. Prof. κΉ€λŒ€μ‹μ˜ μ €μ„œ AGI, μ²œμ‚¬μΈκ°€ μ•…λ§ˆμΈκ°€λŠ” AGI λ„λž˜ μ‹œ 노동 μ†Œλ“ 기반의 ν˜„ 경제 ꡬ쑰와 민주주의의 지속 κ°€λŠ₯성에 λŒ€ν•œ 심측적인 고민을 μ œμ‹œν•œλ‹€.


πŸ”₯ 핡심 포인트 (Key takeaways)

AGI의 λ“±μž₯은 인λ₯˜μ—κ²Œ 이점과 μœ„ν˜‘μ„ λ™μ‹œμ— μ•ˆκ²¨μ£ΌλŠ” 양면성을 μ§€λ‹˜.

1️⃣ AGI의 잠재적 이점 (μ²œμ‚¬μ˜ λ©΄λͺ¨)

  • 압도적인 ν•™μŠ΅ 속도: μΈκ°„μ˜ 읽기/μ“°κΈ°/λŒ€ν™” 방식보닀 훨씬 λΉ λ₯΄κ²Œ ν•™μŠ΅ 데이터λ₯Ό 'ν”ŒλŸ¬κ·ΈμΈ'ν•˜μ—¬ κ°€μ€‘μΉ˜(Weight)λ₯Ό μ •κ΅ν•˜κ²Œ μ‘°μ •ν•¨μœΌλ‘œμ¨ 지식을 μŠ΅λ“ν•¨.

  • μ˜μ†μ μΈ λŠ₯λ ₯ 개발: AIλŠ” μ£½μ§€ μ•Šκ³  μ§€μ†ν•΄μ„œ ν•™μŠ΅ν•  수 μžˆμ–΄ 인간보닀 λ›°μ–΄λ‚œ λŠ₯λ ₯을 κ°–μΆœ κ°€λŠ₯성이 맀우 λ†’μŒ.

  • λ‚œμ œ ν•΄κ²° κ°€λŠ₯μ„±: 인λ₯˜κ°€ ν•΄κ²°ν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•œ κΈ°ν›„ 문제, ν•΅μœ΅ν•© λ°œμ „ λ“± μˆ˜λ§Žμ€ 문제λ₯Ό AGIκ°€ 슀슀둜 μ—°κ΅¬ν•˜κ³  ν•™μŠ΅ν•˜μ—¬ ν•΄κ²°ν•  수 있음.

2️⃣ 인간 노동 κ°€μΉ˜μ˜ λ°•νƒˆ

  • λΆ€κ°€κ°€μΉ˜ 생산 기회 상싀: AGI μ‹œλŒ€κ°€ 되면 인간은 노동을 톡해 λΆ€κ°€κ°€μΉ˜λ₯Ό μ°½μΆœν•˜λŠ” 기회λ₯Ό λ°•νƒˆλ‹Ήν•˜λ©°, μ΄λŠ” κ³§ 노동 μ†Œλ“μ˜ λ‹¨μ ˆλ‘œ 이어짐.

  • μ‚¬νšŒ μ΄ˆλ…„μƒμ—κ²Œ 치λͺ…적: 특히 μ‚¬νšŒμƒν™œμ„ μ‹œμž‘ν•˜μ§€ λͺ»ν•œ μ Šμ€ μ„ΈλŒ€λŠ” AI보닀 더 유λŠ₯함을 증λͺ…ν•  κ²½ν—˜ μžμ²΄κ°€ λΆ€μ‘±ν•˜μ—¬, 노동 μ†Œλ“μ„ 얻을 기회 자체λ₯Ό λ°•νƒˆλ‹Ήν•  μœ„ν—˜μ΄ 큼.

  • 자본 μΆ•μ μ˜ ν•„μš”μ„±: 노동 μ†Œλ“μ˜ λ‹¨μ ˆμ΄ ν˜„μ‹€ν™”λ˜κΈ° 전에 μ΅œλŒ€ν•œ 빨리 λ§Žμ€ 자본/μžμ‚°μ„ μΆ•μ ν•˜λŠ” 것이 개인의 생쑴 μ „λž΅μ΄ 됨.

3️⃣ μƒˆλ‘œμš΄ 쒅속 관계와 μ‚¬νšŒ λΆˆμ•ˆμ • 심화

  • κΈ°λ³Έ μ†Œλ“μ˜ λŒ€μ•ˆ: 노동 μ†Œλ“ 상싀에 λŒ€ν•œ λŒ€μ•ˆμœΌλ‘œ ν˜„κΈˆ λŒ€μ‹  κΈ°λ³Έ 주식(예: μ˜€ν”ˆAI 주식)을 μ§€κΈ‰ν•˜λŠ” λ°©μ•ˆ 등이 λ…Όμ˜λ¨.

  • 기술적 쒅속 μœ„ν—˜: 일뢀 κ΅­κ°€(UAE, 영ꡭ λ“±)κ°€ AGI μ„œλΉ„μŠ€λ₯Ό λ¬΄μƒμœΌλ‘œ μ œκ³΅λ°›λŠ” 계약을 μΆ”μ§„ν•˜κ³  μžˆμœΌλ‚˜, μ΄λŠ” ν–₯ν›„ 가격 인상 μ‹œ 기술 λ³Έκ±΄μ£Όμ˜μ— μ’…μ†λ˜λŠ” μœ„ν—˜μ„ 내포함.

  • 둜마 μ‹œλŒ€μ˜ 평행 이둠: 노동 기회λ₯Ό λ…Έμ˜ˆ(AGI)μ—κ²Œ λΉΌμ•—κΈ΄ 둜마 μ‹œλ―Όμ΄ κΈ°λ³Έ μ†Œλ“μ„ λ°›μ•˜μœΌλ‚˜ λΆˆν–‰ν–ˆκ³ , κ²°κ΅­ μ½œλ‘œμ„Έμ›€μ„ ν†΅ν•œ νƒ€μΈμ˜ 파괴(λ„νŒŒλ―Ό)μ—μ„œ 행볡을 μ°Ύμ•˜λ“―, AGI μ‹œλŒ€μ—λ„ λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ μ‚¬νšŒ 병리 ν˜„μƒμ΄ λ°œμƒν•  수 있음.

4️⃣ 민주주의의 κ·Όκ°„ λΆ•κ΄΄ μœ„ν—˜

  • μ°Έμ •κΆŒμ˜ μ •λ‹Ήμ„± μ•½ν™”: λ―Όμ£Όμ£Όμ˜λŠ” 개인이 노동을 톡해 μ‚¬νšŒμ— κΈ°μ—¬ν•˜λŠ” λŠ₯λ ₯κ³Ό ꢌ리λ₯Ό μ „μ œλ‘œ μ„±λ¦½λ˜μ—ˆμœΌλ‚˜, AGI둜 인해 μ‚¬νšŒμ— κΈ°μ—¬ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 노동 κ°€μΉ˜κ°€ 사라지면 ν•œ 인간이 ν•œ ν‘œλ₯Ό 행사해야 ν•  정당성이 흔듀림.

  • 기술 λ΄‰κ±΄μ£Όμ˜ μ‚¬νšŒ μΆœν˜„ κ°€λŠ₯μ„±: 노동 μ†Œλ“μ„ μžƒμ€ 일반 λŒ€μ€‘μ΄ μ‚¬νšŒ κΈ°μ—¬λ₯Ό λ©ˆμΆ”κ³  κΈ°λ³Έ μ†Œλ“μ— μ˜μ‘΄ν•˜κ²Œ 될 경우, μ‚¬νšŒλŠ” AGIλ₯Ό μ†Œμœ ν•œ μ†Œμˆ˜μ— μ˜ν•΄ ν†΅μ œλ˜λŠ” 기술 λ΄‰κ±΄μ£Όμ˜ μ‚¬νšŒλ‘œ λ³€μ§ˆλ  수 있음.


πŸ” μ •λ¦¬ν•˜λ©΄

AGI μ‹œλŒ€λŠ” ν”Όν•  수 μ—†λŠ” λ―Έλž˜κ°€ 될 κ°€λŠ₯성이 λ†’μœΌλ©°, μ΄λŠ” 인λ₯˜μ—κ²Œ κΈ°ν›„ 변화와 같은 μ „ 지ꡬ적 문제λ₯Ό ν•΄κ²°ν•  λŠ₯λ ₯을 μ œκ³΅ν•˜λŠ” ν˜μ‹ μ μΈ κΈ°νšŒκ°€ 될 수 μžˆλ‹€. ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ λ™μ‹œμ— AGIλŠ” μΈκ°„μ˜ 노동 μ†Œλ“μ„ λ¬΄κ°€μΉ˜ν•˜κ²Œ λ§Œλ“€κ³ , 이에 λŒ€ν•œ λŒ€μ•ˆμœΌλ‘œ μ œμ‹œλ˜λŠ” κΈ°λ³Έ μ†Œλ“ μ œλ„λŠ” 기술적 쒅속과 μ‚¬νšŒμ  λΆˆμ•ˆμ •, 심지어 민주주의의 λΆ•κ΄΄κΉŒμ§€ μ΄ˆλž˜ν•  수 μžˆλ‹€. κ°œμΈμ€ μ΄λŸ¬ν•œ 미래의 흐름을 λƒ‰μ •ν•˜κ²Œ μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³ , 노동 μ†Œλ“μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ˜μ‘΄λ„λ₯Ό 쀄이고 μžλ³Έμ„ μΆ•μ ν•˜λŠ” λ°©ν–₯으둜 μ „λž΅μ„ μˆ˜μ •ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. AGI μ‹œλŒ€μ˜ λ„λž˜λŠ” μΈκ°„μ˜ νŒλ‹¨ κΆŒν•œ 밖에 μžˆμ„ κ°€λŠ₯성이 ν¬λ―€λ‘œ, AGIκ°€ μ²œμ‚¬λ“  μ•…λ§ˆλ“  관계없이, κ°œμΈμ€ λ‹€κ°€μ˜¬ 기술 λ΄‰κ±΄μ£Όμ˜ μ‚¬νšŒμ— λŒ€λΉ„ν•˜λŠ” 투자 μžμ„Έμ™€ ν•™μŠ΅ μ€€λΉ„λ₯Ό κ°–μΆ”λŠ” 것이 κ°€μž₯ μ€‘μš”ν•˜λ‹€κ³  κ°•μ‘°ν•œλ‹€.


πŸ’° 투자 μ‘°μ–Έ

  • μ΅œλŒ€ν•œ λΉ λ₯Έ 자본 좕적: AGI μ‹œλŒ€ λ„λž˜λ‘œ μΈν•œ 노동 μ†Œλ“μ˜ λ°•νƒˆμ€ ν™•μ‹€ν•œ λ°©ν–₯μ„±μ΄λ―€λ‘œ, λ…Έλ™μ˜ κ°€μΉ˜κ°€ λ‚¨μ•„μžˆλŠ” μ‹œκΈ°μ— μ΅œλŒ€ν•œ λ§Žμ€ 자본/μžμ‚°μ„ ν™•λ³΄ν•˜λŠ” 데 집쀑해야 함.

  • 투자λ₯Ό μœ„ν•œ 곡뢀와 μ€€λΉ„: λ§‰μ—°ν•œ FOMO둜 μ‘°κΈ‰ν•˜κ²Œ λˆμ„ 벌렀 ν•˜κΈ°λ³΄λ‹€λŠ”, λˆμ„ 벌 수 μžˆλŠ” μ‚¬λžŒ, 즉 λΆ€λ₯Ό μ°½μΆœν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 쑰건을 λ§Œμ‘±μ‹œν‚€κΈ° μœ„ν•΄ μ—΄μ‹¬νžˆ κ³΅λΆ€ν•˜κ³  μ€€λΉ„ν•˜λŠ” μžμ„Έκ°€ μ€‘μš”ν•¨.

  • 자본 μ†Œλ“ μ€‘μ‹¬μ˜ 포트폴리였 ꡬ좕: λ―Έλž˜μ—λŠ” λ…Έλ™λ³΄λ‹€λŠ” 자본의 κ°€μΉ˜κ°€ μ€‘μš”ν•΄μ§€λ―€λ‘œ, μž₯기적인 κ΄€μ μ—μ„œ μš°λŸ‰ 주식, μ§€μˆ˜ μΆ”μ’… ETF λ“± 자본 μ†Œλ“μ„ μ°½μΆœν•˜λŠ” μžμ‚°μ— λŒ€ν•œ 투자λ₯Ό λŠ˜λ €μ•Ό 함.


🏷️ ν‚€μ›Œλ“œ

#AGI #μΈκ³΅μΌλ°˜μ§€λŠ₯ #AGIμ‹œλŒ€ #λ…Έλ™μ†Œλ“ #λ…Έλ™κ°€μΉ˜ #자본 #κΈ°μˆ λ΄‰κ±΄μ£Όμ˜ #κΈ°λ³Έμ†Œλ“ #λ―Έλž˜λŒ€λΉ„ #μžμ‚°μΆ•μ 


*μ°Έκ³  자료: 《κΉ€λŒ€μ‹μ˜ 인간vs기계》


🚨주의: 이 λΈ”λ‘œκ·Έ μžλ£ŒλŠ” μ €μž‘κΆŒμ— μ˜ν•΄ λ³΄ν˜Έλ©λ‹ˆλ‹€. λΈ”λ‘œκ·Έμ—μ„œ λ‹€λ£¨λŠ” λ‚΄μš©μ€ 투자 ꢌ유λ₯Ό λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠμœΌλ©°, νŠΉμ • 금육 μƒν’ˆμ˜ 맀수 λ˜λŠ” 맀도λ₯Ό ꢌμž₯ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 투자 결정은 μ „μ μœΌλ‘œ 본인의 μ±…μž„ ν•˜μ— 이루어져야 ν•˜λ©°, 이 λΈ”λ‘œκ·Έμ—μ„œ μ±…μž„μ§€μ§€ μ•ŠμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.