Should we cut interest rates or not? The Fed's confusion over liquidity and interest rates rocks the market!

Should we cut interest rates or not? The Fed's confusion over liquidity and interest rates rocks the market!





πŸ“Œ Summary

Amid conflicting statements from top Fed officials over liquidity and interest rates—key factors determining market direction—mixed signals emerge regarding interest rate cut expectations. This complex market landscape unfolds alongside news of Big Tech's aggressive investment expansion and declining cash reserves.


πŸ“– Why it matters!

The most crucial indicator for judging the current economic situation is liquidity, and the key keyword that specifically represents this is interest rates. The direction of U.S. interest rates determines the flow of money into the market, which in turn dictates whether asset market bubbles will burst. Interest rate cuts boost expectations that money will flow freely and the economy will recover, bringing stability to the market. Conversely, rate freezes or hikes can constrict liquidity, triggering collapses starting from vulnerable sectors and amplifying market anxiety. Therefore, statements from Fed officials and various economic indicators play a decisive role in predicting future interest rate policy and market direction. The very confusion surrounding rate cuts versus rate freezes creates instability in the market.


πŸ”₯ Key Takeaways

1️⃣ Fed's No. 2 Official Bolsters Case for Rate Cut

  • New York Fed President (John Williams) suggested rate cuts, stating there is still room for additional rateadjustments in the near term.
  • He cited the current rate level remaining restrictive and the labor market gradually cooling as grounds.
  • He partially countered inflation concerns, noting that secondary effects of tariffs on inflation have not yet been observed.


2️⃣ Conflicting opposing views supporting rate freeze

  • Boston Fed President (Susan Collins) does not support further rate cuts, arguing that maintaining current interest rates helps ease price pressures while tariffs are reflected in the economy.
  • Fed Governor (Michael Barr) also argues that monetary policy must be very cautious and prudent, as inflation remains 1% away from the target.
  • Rate cut advocates focus on weakening employment and labor markets, while rate freeze advocates cite inflation and price instability as their basis.


3️⃣ Aggressive investment expansion plans in the AI computing sector

  • An internal Google report revealed plans to double AI computing service capacity every six months, setting a goal to increase computing power 1,000-fold within five years.
  • Internal recognition emphasizes that delaying or underinvesting is riskier.
  • Expectations are building for securing additional semiconductor market share as news emerges that the U.S. Treasury Department is considering allowing exports of NVIDIA's high-end chips (H200) to China.


4️⃣ Declining Big Tech Cash Reserves and Increased Market Turmoil

  • Reports indicate that major Big Tech firms like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon have significantly reduced their proportion of short-term liquid assets (from the 40% range to the 10% range) compared to 2020, due to aggressive investment execution.
  • Mixed signals from various sources (interest rate cut vs. freeze comments, investment expansion vs. cash reduction) have left the market direction unclear, resulting in mixed trends.


5️⃣ Importance of Key Economic Indicators Released This Week

  • This week will see the release of important economic indicators including September retail sales, September Producer Price Index (PPI), Consumer Sentiment Index, Q3 GDP, October Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE), and the Fed's Beige Book.
  • With no major indicators directly tied to interest rate decisions on the horizon, these figures are expected to play a crucial role in clarifying the market's confusion regarding the direction of interest rate policy.


πŸ” Conclusion

The market is currently experiencing extreme confusion over the direction of interest rates, the core of liquidity, due to conflicting statements from senior Fed officials advocating for rate cuts versus rate holds. Immediately after the New York Fed President hinted at rate cuts citing labor market slowdown, other Fed officials voiced support for keeping rates steady due to inflation concerns, leaving the market directionless. Adding to this, positive news about aggressive investments—such as the review of allowing NVIDIA exports to China and Google's plan to double its AI computingcapacity—emerged. Meanwhile, reports of a sharp decline in Big Tech companies' cash reserves hinted at a risk of investment shortage, further fueling anxiety. Therefore, to resolve market confusion over the interest rate direction, it is crucial whether key economic indicators released this week—such as retail sales, PPI, and PCE—will present a consistent direction. The trend of these indicators is expected to significantly influence the Fed's final interest rate decision. While a majority of Fed members currently support keeping rates unchanged, considering market expectations and the weight of the New York Fed President's remarks, we cautiously project a 60-40 chance of a rate cut.


πŸ’° Investment Advice

  • Interest Rates Given the high uncertainty surrounding the direction of interest rates, it is crucial to closely monitor the U.S. economic indicators released this week to see if market sentiment converges in one direction.
  • AI Computing and semiconductor sectors maintain a positive outlook for the medium to long term due to aggressive investment trends. However, to prepare for increased short-term market volatility stemming from interest rate fluctuations, we maintain a conservative, dollar-cost averaging strategy.
  • If the market remains volatile (hot and cold), avoid excessive bets on specific asset classes and adopt a wait-and-see approach across major asset classes (stocks, bonds, commodities).


🏷️ Keywords

#InterestRates #RateCut #RateHike #Liquidity #Fed #FOMC #AIComputing #Google #NVIDIA #EconomicIndicators #PCE #PPI


κΈˆλ¦¬μΈν•˜ ν• κΉŒ 말까? μ‹œμž₯ 뒀흔든 μœ λ™μ„±κ³Ό 금리λ₯Ό λ‘˜λŸ¬μ‹Ό μ—°μ€€μ˜ ν˜Όλž€!


πŸ“Œ ν•œμ€„μš”μ•½

μ‹œμž₯의 ν–₯방을 κ²°μ •ν•˜λŠ” μœ λ™μ„±κ³Ό 금리λ₯Ό 두고 λ―Έκ΅­ μ—°μ€€ κ³ μœ„ μΈμ‚¬λ“€μ˜ λ°œμ–Έμ΄ μƒμΆ©ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ μ‹œμž₯의 금리 μΈν•˜ 전망에 ν˜Όμ‘°μ„Έκ°€ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚˜λŠ” κ°€μš΄λ°, λΉ…ν…Œν¬μ˜ 곡격적 투자 ν™•λŒ€μ™€ ν˜„κΈˆ μžμ‚° κ°μ†Œ μ†Œμ‹μ΄ 맞물렀 λ³΅μž‘ν•œ μž₯μ„Έκ°€ νŽΌμ³μ§„λ‹€.


πŸ“– μ™œ μ€‘μš”ν•œκ°€! (μ˜λ―Έμ™€ λ§₯락)

ν˜„μž¬ 경제 상황을 νŒλ‹¨ν•˜λŠ” κ°€μž₯ μ€‘μš”ν•œ μ§€ν‘œλŠ” μœ λ™μ„±μ΄λ©°, 이λ₯Ό ꡬ체적으둜 λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚΄λŠ” 핡심 ν‚€μ›Œλ“œκ°€ λ°”λ‘œ κΈˆλ¦¬μ΄λ‹€. λ―Έκ΅­ 금리의 λ°©ν–₯성은 μ‹œμ€‘μ— ν’€λ¦¬λŠ” 돈의 흐름을 κ²°μ •ν•˜λ©°, μ΄λŠ” κ³§ μžμ‚° μ‹œμž₯의 κ±°ν’ˆ λΆ•κ΄΄ μ—¬λΆ€λ₯Ό μ’Œμš°ν•œλ‹€. 금리 μΈν•˜λŠ” 돈이 ν’€λ € κ²½κΈ°κ°€ 회볡될 κ²ƒμ΄λΌλŠ” κΈ°λŒ€λ₯Ό λ†’μ—¬ μ‹œμž₯에 μ•ˆμ •μ„ κ°€μ Έμ˜€μ§€λ§Œ, 금리 동결 λ˜λŠ” 인상은 μœ λ™μ„±μ„ μœ„μΆ•μ‹œμΌœ μ·¨μ•½ν•œ λΆ€λΆ„λΆ€ν„° λΆ•κ΄΄λ₯Ό μΌμœΌν‚¬ 수 μžˆμ–΄ μ‹œμž₯의 λΆˆμ•ˆκ°μ„ μ¦ν­μ‹œν‚¨λ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ—°μ€€ μΈμ‚¬λ“€μ˜ λ°œμ–Έκ³Ό 각쒅 경제 μ§€ν‘œλŠ” ν–₯ν›„ 금리 μ •μ±…κ³Ό μ‹œμž₯의 λ°©ν–₯을 μ˜ˆμΈ‘ν•˜λŠ” 데 결정적인 역할을 ν•˜λ©°, 금리 μΈν•˜μ™€ 금리 동결을 λ‘˜λŸ¬μ‹Ό ν˜Όλž€ν•œ 상황 μžμ²΄κ°€ μ‹œμž₯에 λΆˆμ•ˆμ •μ„±μ„ μ•ΌκΈ°ν•œλ‹€.


πŸ”₯ 핡심 포인트 (Key takeaways)

1️⃣ 금리 μΈν•˜μ— νž˜μ„ 싀은 μ—°μ€€ 2인자 λ°œμ–Έ

  • λ‰΄μš• 연방은행 총재(μ‘΄ μœŒλ¦¬μ—„μŠ€)λŠ” κ°€κΉŒμš΄ μ‹œμΌ λ‚΄ 금리 μΆ”κ°€ μ‘°μ • μ—¬μ§€κ°€ μ—¬μ „νžˆ μžˆλ‹€κ³  μ–ΈκΈ‰ν•˜λ©° 금리 μΈν•˜λ₯Ό μ‹œμ‚¬ν•¨.

  • ν˜„μž¬ 금리 μˆ˜μ€€μ΄ μ—¬μ „νžˆ 긴좕적이며, 노동 μ‹œμž₯이 점차 식어 μ™”λ‹€λŠ” 점을 근거둜 μ œμ‹œν•¨.

  • κ΄€μ„Έλ‘œ μΈν•œ μΈν”Œλ ˆμ΄μ…˜μ˜ 2μ°¨ νŒŒμƒ νš¨κ³ΌλŠ” 아직 보지 λͺ»ν–ˆλ‹€λ©° λ¬Όκ°€ μƒμŠΉ 우렀λ₯Ό 일뢀 λ°˜λ°•ν•¨.


2️⃣ 금리 동결을 μ§€μ§€ν•˜λŠ” λ°˜λŒ€ 의견 좩돌

  • λ³΄μŠ€ν„΄ μ—°μ€€ 총재(μˆ˜μž” 콜린슀)λŠ” ν˜„μž¬ 금리 μˆ˜μ€€ μœ μ§€κ°€ κ΄€μ„Έκ°€ κ²½μ œμ— λ°˜μ˜λ˜λŠ” λ™μ•ˆ λ¬Όκ°€ μ••λ ₯ 완화에 도움이 λœλ‹€λ©° μΆ”κ°€ 금리 μΈν•˜λ₯Ό μ§€μ§€ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠμŒ.

  • μ—°μ€€ 이사(마이클 λ°”) μ—­μ‹œ μΈν”Œλ ˆμ΄μ…˜μ΄ λͺ©ν‘œμΉ˜μ™€ μ—¬μ „νžˆ 1% 차이가 λ‚˜λ―€λ‘œ 톡화 정책을 맀우 μ‘°μ‹¬μŠ€λŸ½κ³  μ‹ μ€‘ν•˜κ²Œ ν•΄μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€κ³  μ£Όμž₯함.

  • 금리 μΈν•˜ μ£Όμž₯은 고용 및 노동 μ‹œμž₯의 약화에 μ΄ˆμ μ„ λ§žμΆ”λ©°, 금리 동결 μ£Όμž₯은 μΈν”Œλ ˆμ΄μ…˜ 및 λ¬Όκ°€ λΆˆμ•ˆμ •μ„ 근거둜 함.


3️⃣ AI μ»΄ν“¨νŒ… λΆ„μ•Όμ˜ 곡격적인 투자 ν™•λŒ€ κ³„νš

  • ꡬ글 λ‚΄λΆ€ λ³΄κ³ μ„œμ—μ„œ AI μ»΄ν“¨νŒ… μ„œλΉ„μŠ€ μš©λŸ‰μ„ λ°˜λ…„λ§ˆλ‹€ 두 λ°°μ”© 늘릴 κ³„νšμ„ 밝히며, 5λ…„ μ•ˆμ— μ»΄ν“¨νŒ… λŠ₯λ ₯을 1천 배둜 λŠ˜λ €μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” λͺ©ν‘œλ₯Ό μ œμ‹œν•¨.

  • 투자λ₯Ό λŠ¦μΆ”κ±°λ‚˜ λΆ€μ‘±ν•˜κ²Œ ν•˜λŠ” 것이 더 μœ„ν—˜ν•˜λ‹€λŠ” λ‚΄λΆ€ 인식이 강쑰됨.

  • λ―Έκ΅­ μž¬μ •νŒ€μ΄ μ—”λΉ„λ””μ•„μ˜ 고사양 μΉ©(H200)의 쀑ꡭ 수좜 ν—ˆμš©μ„ κ²€ν† ν•˜κ² λ‹€λŠ” μ†Œμ‹μ΄ λ‚˜μ˜€λ©΄μ„œ λ°˜λ„μ²΄ μ‹œμž₯의 μΆ”κ°€ νŒ”λ‘œ 확보에 λŒ€ν•œ κΈ°λŒ€κ°μ΄ ν˜•μ„±λ¨.


4️⃣ λΉ…ν…Œν¬ ν˜„κΈˆ μžμ‚° κ°μ†Œ 및 μ‹œμž₯ ν˜Όλž€ μ¦λŒ€

  • ꡬ글, MS, μ•„λ§ˆμ‘΄ λ“± μ£Όμš” λΉ…ν…Œν¬ κΈ°μ—…λ“€μ˜ 단기 ν˜„κΈˆμ„± μžμ‚° 비쀑이 곡격적인 투자 μ§‘ν–‰μœΌλ‘œ 인해 2020λ…„ λŒ€λΉ„ 크게 κ°μ†Œ(40%λŒ€ → 10%λŒ€λ‘œ)ν–ˆλ‹€λŠ” 보고가 λ‚˜μ˜΄.

  • λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ 자료(금리 μΈν•˜ vs 동결 λ°œμ–Έ, 투자 ν™•λŒ€ vs ν˜„κΈˆ κ°μ†Œ)κ°€ ν˜Όμž¬λ˜μ–΄ μ‹œμž₯이 λ°©ν–₯타λ₯Ό λͺ…ν™•νžˆ μž‘μ§€ λͺ»ν•˜κ³  ν˜Όμ‘°μ„Έλ₯Ό λ³΄μž„.


5️⃣ 이번 μ£Ό λ°œν‘œλ  μ£Όμš” 경제 μ§€ν‘œμ˜ μ€‘μš”μ„±

  • 이번 μ£Όμ—λŠ” 9μ›” μ†Œλ§€ 판맀, 9μ›” μƒμ‚°μž λ¬Όκ°€(PPI), μ†ŒλΉ„μž 심리 μ§€μˆ˜, 3λΆ„κΈ° GDP, 10μ›” κ°œμΈμ†ŒλΉ„μ§€μΆœ(PCE), μ—°μ€€ 베이지뢁 λ“± μ€‘μš”ν•œ 경제 μ§€ν‘œλ“€μ΄ λ°œν‘œλ  μ˜ˆμ •μž„.

  • 금리 결정에 핡심적인 메이저 μ§€ν‘œκ°€ λ‚˜μ˜€μ§€ μ•ŠλŠ” μƒν™©μ—μ„œ, 이 μ§€ν‘œλ“€μ΄ 금리 μ •μ±… λ°©ν–₯에 λŒ€ν•œ μ‹œμž₯의 ν˜Όλž€μ„ μ •λ¦¬ν•˜λŠ” 데 μ€‘μš”ν•œ 역할을 ν•  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ μ˜ˆμƒλ¨.


πŸ” μ •λ¦¬ν•˜λ©΄

ν˜„μž¬ μ‹œμž₯은 μœ λ™μ„±μ˜ 핡심인 금리의 ν–₯방을 두고 금리 μΈν•˜μ™€ 금리 동결을 μ£Όμž₯ν•˜λŠ” μ—°μ€€ κ³ μœ„ μΈμ‚¬λ“€μ˜ μƒμΆ©ν•˜λŠ” λ°œμ–ΈμœΌλ‘œ 인해 κ·Ήμ‹¬ν•œ ν˜Όλž€μ„ κ²ͺκ³  μžˆλ‹€. 노동 μ‹œμž₯ λ‘”ν™”λ₯Ό 근거둜 금리 μΈν•˜λ₯Ό μ‹œμ‚¬ν•œ λ‰΄μš• 연은 총재의 λ°œμ–Έ 직후, λ‹€λ₯Έ μ—°μ€€ 인사듀은 μΈν”Œλ ˆμ΄μ…˜ 우렀λ₯Ό 이유둜 금리 동결을 μ§€μ§€ν•˜λ©° μ‹œμž₯의 λ°©ν–₯타λ₯Ό μžƒκ²Œ λ§Œλ“ λ‹€. 여기에 더해 μ—”λΉ„λ””μ•„μ˜ 쀑ꡭ 수좜 ν—ˆμš© κ²€ν† , κ΅¬κΈ€μ˜ AI μ»΄ν“¨νŒ… μš©λŸ‰ 두 λ°° ν™•λŒ€ κ³„νš λ“± 곡격적인 투자 κ΄€λ ¨ ν˜Έμž¬κ°€ λ‚˜μ˜€λŠ” ν•œνŽΈ, λΉ…ν…Œν¬ κΈ°μ—…λ“€μ˜ ν˜„κΈˆ μžμ‚°μ΄ κΈ‰κ°ν–ˆλ‹€λŠ” λ³΄κ³ μ„œλŠ” 투자 λΆ€μ‘± μœ„ν—˜μ„ μ•”μ‹œν•˜λ©° λΆˆμ•ˆ μš”μ†Œλ₯Ό λ”ν•œλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ 금리 λ°©ν–₯에 λŒ€ν•œ μ‹œμž₯의 ν˜Όλž€μ„ ν•΄μ†Œν•˜κΈ° μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 이번 주에 λ°œν‘œλ  μ†Œλ§€ 판맀, PPI, PCE λ“± μ£Όμš” 경제 μ§€ν‘œλ“€μ΄ μΌκ΄€λœ λ°©ν–₯성을 μ œμ‹œν•˜λŠ”μ§€ μ—¬λΆ€κ°€ 맀우 μ€‘μš”ν•˜λ©°, 이 μ§€ν‘œμ˜ 흐름이 μ—°μ€€μ˜ μ΅œμ’… 금리 결정에 큰 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ μ˜ˆμƒλœλ‹€. ν˜„μž¬ μ—°μ€€ μœ„μ› λ‹€μˆ˜λŠ” 금리 동결을 μ§€μ§€ν•˜κ³  μžˆμœΌλ‚˜, μ‹œμž₯의 κΈ°λŒ€μ™€ λ‰΄μš• 연은 총재 λ°œμ–Έμ˜ κ°€μ€‘μΉ˜λ₯Ό κ³ λ €ν•˜μ—¬ 금리 μΈν•˜ κ°€λŠ₯성을 6λŒ€ 4둜 μ‘°μ‹¬μŠ€λŸ½κ²Œ μ „λ§ν•œλ‹€.


πŸ’° 투자 μ‘°μ–Έ

  • 금리 λ°©ν–₯에 λŒ€ν•œ λΆˆν™•μ‹€μ„±μ΄ 높은 만큼, 이번 μ£Ό λ°œν‘œλ˜λŠ” λ―Έκ΅­ 경제 μ§€ν‘œλ“€μ„ 주의 깊게 μ‚΄ν”Όλ©° μ‹œμž₯의 흐름이 ν•œμͺ½μœΌλ‘œ λͺ¨μ΄λŠ”μ§€ ν™•μΈν•˜λŠ” 것이 μ€‘μš”ν•¨.

  • AI μ»΄ν“¨νŒ… 및 λ°˜λ„μ²΄ λΆ„μ•Όμ˜ 곡격적 투자 κΈ°μ‘°λŠ” 쀑μž₯기적으둜 κΈμ •μ μ΄λ‚˜, 금리 변동에 λ”°λ₯Έ 단기 μ‹œμž₯ 변동성 ν™•λŒ€μ— λŒ€λΉ„ν•˜μ—¬ 보수적인 κ΄€μ μ—μ„œμ˜ λΆ„ν•  맀수 μ „λž΅μ„ μœ μ§€ν•¨.

  • μ‹œμž₯이 ν˜Όλž€ν•œ 상황(μ˜¨νƒ• 냉탕)이 지속될 경우, νŠΉμ • μžμ‚°κ΅°μ— λŒ€ν•œ κ³Όλ„ν•œ λ² νŒ…μ„ ν”Όν•˜κ³  μ£Όμš” μžμ‚°κ΅°(주식, μ±„κΆŒ, μ›μžμž¬) μ „λ°˜μ˜ 상황을 κ΄€λ§ν•˜λŠ” νƒœλ„κ°€ ν•„μš”ν•¨.


🏷️ ν‚€μ›Œλ“œ

#금리 #κΈˆλ¦¬μΈν•˜ #κΈˆλ¦¬λ™κ²° #μœ λ™μ„± #μ—°μ€€ #FOMC #AIμ»΄ν“¨νŒ… #ꡬ글 #μ—”λΉ„λ””μ•„ #κ²½μ œμ§€ν‘œ #PCE #PPI


🚨주의: 이 λΈ”λ‘œκ·Έ μžλ£ŒλŠ” μ €μž‘κΆŒμ— μ˜ν•΄ λ³΄ν˜Έλ©λ‹ˆλ‹€. λΈ”λ‘œκ·Έμ—μ„œ λ‹€λ£¨λŠ” λ‚΄μš©μ€ 투자 ꢌ유λ₯Ό λͺ©μ μœΌλ‘œ ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠμœΌλ©°, νŠΉμ • 금육 μƒν’ˆμ˜ 맀수 λ˜λŠ” 맀도λ₯Ό ꢌμž₯ν•˜μ§€ μ•ŠμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 투자 결정은 μ „μ μœΌλ‘œ 본인의 μ±…μž„ ν•˜μ— 이루어져야 ν•˜λ©°, 이 λΈ”λ‘œκ·Έμ—μ„œ μ±…μž„μ§€μ§€ μ•ŠμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€.


λͺ…사: κ°œμš”, 일람, μ μš” ν˜•μš©μ‚¬: μš”μ•½ν•œ, μ•½μ‹μ˜